Workers are ‘habit hugging’ despite new training, survey finds
A TalentLMS survey of 1,500 U.S. employees finds fewer than half consistently apply new ways of working after training — a phenomenon the company calls 'habit hugging.' Among workers expected to use AI on the job, more than a third said they sometimes revert to old methods, and 73% reported blending old and new approaches. Managerial behavior emerges as a critical lever: adoption rates were 49% when managers modeled new methods themselves, versus just 22% when they did not.

Key facts
- Fewer than 50% of U.S. employees consistently use new work methods after training, per TalentLMS
- More than 1 in 3 employees expected to use AI at work sometimes revert to old methods
- 73% of surveyed workers blend old and new working methods simultaneously
- 60% say their organizations prioritize results over adherence to new methods
- Adoption rate is 49% when managers model new methods vs. 22% when they do not
- Only 3% of decision-makers rated their leaders 'highly prepared' for AI adoption (ManpowerGroup Talent Solutions)
- Half of CHROs in Gallup's Global CHRO Roundtable lacked confidence in managers' AI guidance ability
- 1 in 4 workers globally have left jobs due to insufficient upskilling opportunities (Randstad Digital)
A new survey from learning management platform TalentLMS has put a name to a phenomenon many L&D professionals already sense in their data: 'habit hugging,' the tendency of employees to cling to familiar processes even after receiving formal training on better alternatives.
The survey, which polled 1,500 U.S. employees, found that fewer than half consistently use new ways of working following training. Among the subset of respondents expected to use artificial intelligence in their roles, more than a third said they sometimes return to older methods — and 73% reported mixing both old and new approaches in their day-to-day work. A telling 60% said their organizations placed greater value on getting results than on using a prescribed new method, which may implicitly sanction the reversion.
**The Manager Multiplier** The most striking finding concerns leadership behavior. Employees whose managers consistently adopted new ways of working did so themselves at a rate of 49% — more than double the 22% adoption rate observed among employees whose managers did not model the change. The implication is clear: learning programs that ignore manager behavior are operating at a structural disadvantage.
That finding aligns with a broader pattern of leadership unpreparedness documented elsewhere. Only 3% of decision-makers surveyed by ManpowerGroup Talent Solutions in a July report rated their leaders as 'highly prepared' to lead AI adoption. Separately, half of the CHROs participating in Gallup's Global CHRO Roundtable in August said they lacked confidence in managers' ability to guide employees through AI transitions.
**A Wider Upskilling Crisis** Habit hugging does not exist in a vacuum. A Randstad Digital report published earlier in the year found that many training programs have failed to keep pace with the speed of AI-driven platform deployment. That research also noted that 1 in 4 workers globally had left their jobs citing a lack of upskilling opportunities — underscoring that the stakes of the adoption gap extend beyond productivity to retention.
**What L&D Leaders Should Do** Epignosis CEO Dimitris Tsingos, whose company is the parent of TalentLMS, framed the challenge in terms of AI's broader promise. 'The real opportunity with AI is to free up human time and brainpower for higher-value work, like judgment, leadership, and problem-solving,' he said in a statement. 'But achieving that potential depends on making new ways of working an integral part of everyday work.'
Practitioners responding to this research are increasingly being asked to do more than design courses. The L&D function must also invest in human skills — emotional intelligence, communication, and collaboration — alongside technical upskilling, while building learning experiences that are job-specific and person-specific rather than generic. Immersive, AI-enabled learning formats are gaining traction as replacements for traditional, classroom-style training modules.
For HR technology buyers, the data adds urgency to evaluating not just what platforms employees are trained on, but how adoption is tracked, reinforced, and socially modeled from the top down.
Verified vendor profiles for the companies named above — DHRMap wires every story to its directory.

Corporate learning and development company that builds custom training content, including VR, AR and XR, eLearning and instructor-led programs.

Randstad is a publicly listed global talent company providing staffing, professional recruitment, digital talent, and enterprise workforce solutions.

Cloud learning management system (LMS) for employee training, onboarding, and partner or customer education.
Multiplier is an Employer of Record (EOR) and global payroll platform for hiring, paying and managing employees across countries.
Technology talent and digital enablement brand of staffing giant Randstad.

Global workforce-solutions company providing staffing, recruitment and workforce management, with brands including Manpower, Experis and Talent Solutions.
DHRMap tracks every HR-tech company over time — here's the rest of the coverage.
Training spend is wasted if behavior doesn't change — and 'habit hugging' quantifies exactly how much slippage is occurring. With AI rollouts accelerating across every sector, HR and L&D leaders need to design for adoption, not just completion. The manager-modeling data is particularly actionable: leadership development and L&D are no longer separate workstreams.
Work at Roundtable? Claim the profile — free · Get featured on DHRmap — from $1,000/year
Have HR-tech news? Submit it free · Publish a Sponsored article — $300

