Greenhouse vs Ashby
Best for
Talent and recruiting teams that want a structured, collaborative hiring process with consistent candidate evaluation and reporting.
Scaling startups and mid-market/enterprise talent teams wanting an all-in-one ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one system.
Strong when
Structured hiring methodology, interview kits and scorecards, hiring-team collaboration and recruiting analytics are priority requirements.
Consolidating separate ATS, sourcing/CRM, scheduling and analytics tools and prioritizing self-serve reporting and automation.
Validate before buying
Greenhouse is a dedicated recruiting/ATS platform, not a full HCM suite; buyers wanting core HRIS, payroll or benefits should plan integrations with those systems.
Data is stored and processed in the United States, and ISO 27001 is not confirmed on official pages; pricing is quote-based.
Pricing
Quote-based; Greenhouse routes buyers to sales for tier and edition pricing. Validate edition, modules and add-ons for your hiring volume.
Per-seat and quote-based, with an entry price reported around $300/month; the open API is included in all tiers.
Implementation
Configuration depth for structured hiring, scorecards and job workflows should be scoped; validate integration setup with your HRIS and job boards.
A vendor case study reports implementation in about one month.
Employees
501-1000
51-200
Headquarters
New York
San Francisco
Founded
2012
2019
Categories
Applicant Tracking SystemOnboarding
Applicant Tracking SystemRecruiting CRM
Core capabilities
Applicant tracking (ATS)Structured hiring and scorecardsSourcing and candidate managementInterview scheduling and collaborationAI-assisted recruitingRecruiting analytics and reportingOnboardingIntegrations and open API
Applicant tracking (ATS)Sourcing and candidate CRMInterview schedulingRecruiting analyticsHeadcount planningAI notetaker and automationReferralsJob-board embed
Decision snapshots reflect verified profiles where available. Greenhouse · Ashby