Ashby vs Greenhouse
Best for
Scaling startups and mid-market/enterprise talent teams wanting an all-in-one ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one system.
Talent and recruiting teams that want a structured, collaborative hiring process with consistent candidate evaluation and reporting.
Strong when
Consolidating separate ATS, sourcing/CRM, scheduling and analytics tools and prioritizing self-serve reporting and automation.
Structured hiring methodology, interview kits and scorecards, hiring-team collaboration and recruiting analytics are priority requirements.
Validate before buying
Data is stored and processed in the United States, and ISO 27001 is not confirmed on official pages; pricing is quote-based.
Greenhouse is a dedicated recruiting/ATS platform, not a full HCM suite; buyers wanting core HRIS, payroll or benefits should plan integrations with those systems.
Pricing
Per-seat and quote-based, with an entry price reported around $300/month; the open API is included in all tiers.
Quote-based; Greenhouse routes buyers to sales for tier and edition pricing. Validate edition, modules and add-ons for your hiring volume.
Implementation
A vendor case study reports implementation in about one month.
Configuration depth for structured hiring, scorecards and job workflows should be scoped; validate integration setup with your HRIS and job boards.
Employees
51-200
501-1000
Headquarters
San Francisco
New York
Founded
2019
2012
Categories
Applicant Tracking SystemRecruiting CRM
Applicant Tracking SystemOnboarding
Core capabilities
Applicant tracking (ATS)Sourcing and candidate CRMInterview schedulingRecruiting analyticsHeadcount planningAI notetaker and automationReferralsJob-board embed
Applicant tracking (ATS)Structured hiring and scorecardsSourcing and candidate managementInterview scheduling and collaborationAI-assisted recruitingRecruiting analytics and reportingOnboardingIntegrations and open API
Decision snapshots reflect verified profiles where available. Ashby · Greenhouse