Paycom vs Paylocity
Best for
U.S. organizations with multistate or multi-entity operations that want to consolidate fragmented HR and payroll into a single database.
Small and mid-market U.S. organizations that want a unified payroll and HR/HCM platform with strong employee self-service.
Strong when
Employee-driven payroll (Beti), heavy automation and one system of record across the employee lifecycle are priorities.
Employee experience, mobile adoption and a single system of record spanning HR and, increasingly, finance are priorities.
Validate before buying
Pricing is quote-based and opaque; some G2 reviewers report performance during peak usage and navigation limitations. International coverage is via Global HCM rather than a global-first footprint.
Reviewers cite support consistency during peak times; implementation/setup fees apply and global payroll is integration-based rather than native.
Pricing
Per-employee-per-month and quote-based; no public list pricing on the official site.
Per-employee-per-month and quote-based; a demo request is required for a customized quote.
Implementation
The single-database model markets no cross-module data re-entry; Paycom cites strong G2 implementability rankings (vendor-reported).
Setup and implementation fees apply and vary by company size and configuration.
Employees
5001-10000
5001-10000
Headquarters
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Schaumburg, Illinois
Founded
1998
1997
Categories
HCMTalent ManagementPayroll
PayrollHCM
Core capabilities
Single-database HCMPayroll and payroll taxEmployee self-service payroll (Beti)Applicant tracking and onboardingPerformance and learningSuccession and compensation planningTime, attendance and schedulingBenefits administration and ACA compliance
Payroll and tax filingHRISBenefits administrationTime and attendanceTalent managementOnboarding and performanceEmployee self-service and mobileEmployee engagement / community
Decision snapshots reflect verified profiles where available. Paycom · Paylocity